The Orwell Prize and Johann Hari

September 29, 2011

UPDATED Johann Hari has contacted the Prize and offered to repay the Prize money. Political Quarterly, one of the partners in running the Prize and the partner responsible for paying the prize money that year, has decided not to pursue the prize money, but has instead invited Hari to make an appropriate donation to English PEN, of which George Orwell was a member.

The Council of the Orwell Prize now considers the matter to be at an end.

27 September 2011, 14:00 The Council of the Orwell Prize would like to clarify a few points about the Orwell Prize for Journalism awarded to Johann Hari in 2008 and subsequently returned. The Council can confirm that, subject to any further representations by Hari, the Orwell Prize for Journalism 2008 would have been vacated in any case.

On 30 June 2011 the Council said that it would be investigating the basis for allegations made about Hari’s work. This included writing to Johann Hari and to the (then) editor of The Independent, with a number of questions. Hari responded; the editor did not, either to this or a subsequent set of queries.

The Orwell Prize has no independent capacity to research the work that is submitted. It relies on the integrity of authors and of their publisher’s editorial practices.

On the 21 July (as stated on 15 July) an emergency meeting of the Council met ‘to consider our review of Johann Hari’s material and material submitted by the public before that time’.

The Council considered one article submitted by Hari in 2008, ‘How multiculturalism is betraying women’ (The Independent, 30 April 2007), on the basis of the evidence which had been received.  The Council concluded that the article contained inaccuracies and conflated different parts of someone else’s story (specifically, a report in Der Spiegel). The Council ruled that the substantial use of unattributed and unacknowledged material did not meet the standards expected of Orwell Prize-winning journalism.

The Council drafted a decision, saying that subject to a deadline, it would announce that the Prize was vacated, but that Hari would be given an opportunity to make any further representations in his defence and an opportunity to ‘apologise to the judges, the other applicants, the Prize and the public, and to resign the Prize before the announcement’.

However, the Council found that The Independent had prohibited Hari from responding to any communication while the paper’s own investigation, conducted by Andreas Whittam Smith, was in progress. (This also appears to have prevented Hari from answering a second email sent to him before the Council meeting.) As a result, the Council decided that it was impossible to announce the decision as it could not communicate with Hari, nor give him the opportunity to reply (as stated on 25 July).

On the afternoon of 14 September, a courier returned the plaque which had been awarded to Johann Hari on winning the Orwell Prize for Journalism 2008. There was no note of explanation. The prize money (£2000) has also not been returned. The director of the Prize telephoned the editor of The Independent who confirmed that Hari had returned the Prize, which was also confirmed later by Hari’s ‘A personal apology’, published online by The Independent.

The Council of the Orwell Prize accepted Hari’s return of the Prize.

Annalena McAfee, Albert Scardino and Sir John Tusa – the Journalism Prize judges from 2008 – have decided not to re-award the 2008 Prize, despite the high quality journalism on that year’s shortlist.

The Council would like to apologise to those who entered the Journalism Prize 2008. We also apologise to the judges, for not being able to conduct a fair assessment at the time. It is also grateful to those who persisted in examining Hari’s articles and brought the discrepancies to the Council’s attention.

Bill Hamilton, the acting chair of the Council of the Orwell Prize, said: ‘The Council is delighted to be able to put this difficult episode behind it finally, and get on with the important business of running the Prizes and promoting the values of George Orwell into the future.’

Jean Seaton, director of the Prize, said: ‘We now look forward to the Orwell Prize 2012, igniting further public discussion around politics, political writing and journalism, and celebrating the work which comes closest to Orwell’s ambition, “to make political writing into an art”.’

ENDS

Johann Hari has contacted the Prize and offered to repay the Prize money. Political Quarterly, one of the partners in running the Prize and the partner responsible for paying the prize money that year, has decided not to pursue the prize money, but has instead invited Hari to make an appropriate donation to English PEN, of which George Orwell was a member.

The Council of the Orwell Prize now considers the matter to be at an end.

  • Tissue Price

    Is the £2,000 not part of the prize?  I am at a loss as to why it has not been returned.

  • Anonymous

    In the “apology” in the Independent Hari said

    “even though I stand by the articles which won the George Orwell Prize, I am returning it as an act of contrition for the errors I made elsewhere.”

    Andreas Whittam Smith spent two months conducting an inquiry into Hari’s journalism so it would be useful to know whether he found anything wrong with those particular articles. If he did not, then was his inquiry thorough enough? If he did then why was Hari allowed to defend the articles in his “apology”; in doing so he was once more misleading his readers.

  • http://twitter.com/fraac1 keith jenks

    Drugs and whores don’t buy themselves.

  • Hari

    The prize was returned with “no note of explanation”, and you only got to hear of the details via Hari’s own spin article in The Indy?

    That’s astonishing.

  • RFH

    Thank you for issuing this honest, unbiased and straightforward account of what happened vis a vis your prize and Johann Hari’s returning of it. That is a damned sight more than can be of either Hari or the Independent. 
    That newspaper’s behavior towards its readers, journalistic peers and staff concerning this matter has been so craven, disingenuous and hypocritical, I’d venture to suggest its credibility has been near-irreparably damaged. 
    Indeed, I’d cancel my subscription immediately if I had one, or had bothered to read it in the last four years. 

  • Anonymous

    On 31 July Hopi Sen wrote a detailed critique of the article referred to above on the blog Liberal Conspiracy. http://liberalconspiracy.org/2011/07/31/johann-hari-and-the-article-for-speigel/  I urge anyone interested in this story to read it.

    Sen showed how the article was not prizeworthy but “at best a third rate Ctrl-C article”. Not only was it all based on the work of a Der Spiegel journalist, Hari had deliberately distorted the facts and quotes he was plagiarising in order to produce a totally misleading piece. This was not a matter of carelessness or an oversight, but a calculated act to deceive his readers. Hari chose that article as one of his best to be submitted to the Orwell Prize judges, and the Independent is happy that he stand by it. Incredible.

  • http://timworstall.com/2011/09/28/oh-aye-mr-hari/ Oh Aye Mr. Hari?

    [...] 28th, 2011 · No Comments On the afternoon of 14 September, a courier returned the plaque which had been awarded to Johann Hari on winning [...]

  • http://kanaal7.com/johann-hari-hasnt-returned-2000-orwell-prize.html Johann Hari hasn’t returned £2,000 Orwell prize » KANAAL7.COM

    [...] onto the cash prize according to organisers of the prestigious journalism award. They have issued a press release, from which we [...]

  • http://edinburgheye.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/johann-haris-orwell-prize/ Johann Hari’s Orwell Prize | Edinburgh Eye

    [...] The Orwell Prize can’t research the work submitted: they have relied on “the integrity of authors and of their publisher’s editorial practices”. In July 2011, the Council of the Orwell Prize met to investigate the basis for the allegations being made about Hari’s work, and found – as I have just done – that the article contained “inaccuracies and conflated different parts of someone else’s story”. The Council ruled that the substantial use of unattributed and unacknowledged material did not meet the standards expected of Orwell Prize-winning journalism. 27th September 2011 [...]

  • http://blog.pigsaw.org/permalink/2011/09/30/2122 Pigsaw Blog » Blog Archive » Bookmarks for 30 Sep 2011

    [...] The Orwell Prize and Johann Hari | The Orwell Prize"The Council of the Orwell Prize would like to clarify a few points about the Orwell Prize for Journalism awarded to Johann Hari in 2008 and subsequently returned. The Council can confirm that, subject to any further representations by Hari, the Orwell Prize for Journalism 2008 would have been vacated in any case." (johann_hari prize plagiarism ) [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus